FishForums.com - View Single Post

mr.dark-saint · 09-01-2005, 05:01 AM

>>solar-ton i think australlian lungfish are a protected species and they cost A LOT of money<<

Yeah it's been listed on the CITIES I gave up long ago in keeping them in my lifetime unless I move to Australia (not likely to make the move). So, I haven't looked at their status, they may have changed like the Asian Arowana which are captive raised (that's still an iffy market with shadowy figures).

starrfish71 how do you think they arrived at that conclusion (she laid eggs?)? I suppose DNA test would be proof positive like they do with macaws. Will I have this done not likely (I'm cheap like that)

.

09-01-2005, 05:01 AM	#14
mr.dark-saint Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Age: 36 Posts: 177 User Feedback: (0)	>>solar-ton i think australlian lungfish are a protected species and they cost A LOT of money<< Yeah it's been listed on the CITIES I gave up long ago in keeping them in my lifetime unless I move to Australia (not likely to make the move). So, I haven't looked at their status, they may have changed like the Asian Arowana which are captive raised (that's still an iffy market with shadowy figures). starrfish71 how do you think they arrived at that conclusion (she laid eggs?)? I suppose DNA test would be proof positive like they do with macaws. Will I have this done not likely (I'm cheap like that) .