FishForums.com  

Go Back   FishForums.com > Freshwater > Aquatic Plants
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Members currently in the Chat:2
members chatting
  Users In Chat Room:  mesapod, frogman5      Come On In!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-02-2007, 09:55 PM   #1
dcristalli90
Fishy Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 18
Default Need help deciding

Well i just bought a 30 inch pc strip with a 65 watt bulb, a couple bags of eco complete, a piece of driftwood, etc, and now all i need is the tank and plants obviously. I was thinking of either the 20 gallon long (30x12x12) or the 29 gallon (30x12x17) i don't think i want the 37 because it is way to tall. so which should i get the 20 gallon long which is what i'm kind of leaning towards or the 29 gallon? I will have plenty of light if i get the 20 g and only a moderate amount of light if i get the 29, so that's another reason i'm leaning towards the 20.
dcristalli90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 10:30 PM   #2
JustOneMore20
Moderator
 
JustOneMore20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Birmingham, AL
Age: 22
Posts: 3,579
Default

With the 20g, you'll be on the border of needing CO2, while with the 29g, you shouldn't with that light. I'd probably go with the 20 long though, personally. You'll have alot of plant choices with the 20g long.
__________________
*Kristin*
5 Planted tanks:
55g, 40g, 29g, 20g, 5.5g


JustOneMore20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 11:44 PM   #3
dcristalli90
Fishy Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 18
Default

yeah that's what i was thinking, and my friend will sell me his old pressurized unit, so if i need it i will buy it. can you think of any good aquascape plant suggestions? i was thinking glossostigma for the foreground, then i have a piece of bogwood with a bunch of java fern attached to it (should i place that in the middle?), where else should i put plants, name suggestions?

Last edited by dcristalli90; 02-02-2007 at 11:56 PM.
dcristalli90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2007, 05:04 PM   #4
Damon
Aquatic Naturalist
 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Age: 32
Posts: 14,982
Send a message via Yahoo to Damon
Default

Go with the 29 gallon. Still plenty of light and more room for fish and plants.
__________________
For in much wisdom [is] much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.


Member of the AGA (Aquatic Gardner's Association)
Member of the IBC (International Betta Congress)
Damon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2007, 05:49 PM   #5
BV77
Senior Member
 
BV77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 486
Default

I'd go with the 29 myself, as a 20 long doesn't have much height for a nice plant display, IMO
BV77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2007, 03:47 PM   #6
TigerBarb12
Tiger Barb Alpha Male
 
TigerBarb12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Milford, OH
Age: 16
Posts: 541
Default

id go with the 20 long, i think it would look nice
__________________
My Tank

38 Gallon: Tiger Barb x5
Serpae Tetra x6
Blue Gourami x1
Bloodfin Tetra x2
Gold Barb x1

10 Gallon: Gold Gourami x1

10 Gallon: 5 Shiners (Wild)

TigerBarb12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 07:30 PM   #7
girth vader
Hey Now!
 
girth vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 616
Default

29g for sure. It's the same footprint as the 20 but you're getting more height for growth as Damon said. The wpg is a bit more complicated then just calculating total watts and gallons however it's a pretty good rule of thumb. It has a lot to do with surface area as well, so your WPG will not change in the 29g as much as you think. at only 17" the light will reach the bottom without any trouble. The bulb selection will be your biggest choice. I have used Coralife 6700k, all glass 8000k, GE 9325k, and coralife 10k and I like the 6700k hands down, although a lot of ppl like the GE and swear by it. Talk to some plant heads on a few sites and choose the bulb that will best suit the plants you want. I would also consider a carbon source either hi/low tech or excel. but don't think that your light source will not be as adequate for the 29 as opposed to the 20, it will be the same for all intensive purposes. Have fun planning your scape, thats half the fun!

cheers.

Zig.

a good read if you want help understanding minimum light requirements & wpg

http://rexgrigg.com/./mlt.htm
__________________
I have a tank!!! A nice one too!
girth vader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 03:51 AM   #8
MyraVan
Senior Member
 
MyraVan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 864
Default

Here's another vote for the 29. That amount of light will allow you to grow plenty of things. Sure you won't be able to grow the most demanding of plants, but with careful choice of plants you will be able to include a few pink or red ones (I've got pinkish hygro and a red Nymphea stellata growing in a 20g with 30W of lighting, so you should have no probs with them in yours!)

I also agree that the extra height will be great for allowing nice tall plants for your background, and of course the extra gallons will allow you to stock more fish.

An all around win for the 29g, I think.

As for bulbs, I like daylight bulbs myself, and I think a daylight bulb is about 6500k, so the Coralife 6700k sounds good to me too.
MyraVan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 09:12 AM   #9
Damon
Aquatic Naturalist
 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Age: 32
Posts: 14,982
Send a message via Yahoo to Damon
Default

Remember bigger is better. Your fish and plants will tank you for it.
__________________
For in much wisdom [is] much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.


Member of the AGA (Aquatic Gardner's Association)
Member of the IBC (International Betta Congress)
Damon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 08:44 PM   #10
Daniel1
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Age: 17
Posts: 64
Default

definately get the 29 gals tank..your set up will look nicer..and you will have more choices.
i have a 29 gals tank..which is medium light...on which i have 8 black neon tetras, a pair of appistograma borelli, 3 ottos , 3 cories and more than 15 shrimp...
Daniel1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2007, 10:19 AM   #11
mayastarocker
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Holton, Michigan
Age: 19
Posts: 66
Default

I agree with a 29 gal. It might be a bit more pricy if you buy one new but it will be better in the long run.
__________________
10 FW gallon
1 pleco
1 black kulhi loach
1 zebra danio
1 leopard danio
1 male dwarf flame gourami
1 female swordtail
2 bullfrog tapoles
2 black widow tetras

5 gallon FW
1 female black molly
2 male mollies
3-4 tree frog tadpoles
mayastarocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Got a spare 5 gallon, need help deciding what fish BettasRFriends Beginner Freshwater 11 05-26-2005 08:18 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright - FishForums.com