FishForums.com  

Go Back   FishForums.com > Freshwater > Equipment & Technologies
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Members currently in the Chat:2
members chatting
  Users In Chat Room:  mesapod, curtman602003      Come On In!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-18-2007, 02:13 PM   #1
Moltenice
Bike/Car guy...
 
Moltenice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Age: 26
Posts: 37
Default Help me decide between two canisters

Hey guys, sorry if it has already been talked about, but to tell you the truth I am just kind of excited and want to talk a bit about my choices for my new tank which is 60 gals.


Ok so I am looking at a few filters right now. One is the Rena filstar external canister filter, XP2 rated for aquariums up to 75 gal and has a flow rate of 300gph.......$80


&

Penn Plax Cascade Canister Filter 700
185 GPH For Tanks Up To 65 Gallons...........$90


I dont know which Direction I am going with the fish yet so I want a good filter (not a hang on) that will be able to handle a 60gal tank. Based on specs it seems the XP2 rated at 75 gal might be best but I dont know the companies and what not. So thats why I am asking.

As for the tank type I am going to go in one of these directions
Salt water (scared to, but I really like salt water fish)
or
African Cichlids
Tropical agressive

thanks



Or hell should I just run with
Rena filstar canister filter XP3
For aquariums up to 175 gal and has a flow rate of 350gph...$109.. seems like overkill with a capacity rating 100gals over what I will have, but who knows
__________________
10gal community tank.... 4 Neon tetras, 1 rainbow molly adult and her baby (rice grain size currently)

55gal Malawi tank..... Caribbean white sand, artificial Rock structure with lots of tunnels, and some hearty plants. Powered by a Filstar XP4.

Last edited by Moltenice; 03-18-2007 at 02:50 PM.
Moltenice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007, 03:03 PM   #2
Damon
Aquatic Naturalist
 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Age: 32
Posts: 14,982
Send a message via Yahoo to Damon
Default

Get the XP3.....
__________________
For in much wisdom [is] much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.


Member of the AGA (Aquatic Gardner's Association)
Member of the IBC (International Betta Congress)
Damon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007, 05:12 PM   #3
Gump
Senior Member
 
Gump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Age: 24
Posts: 447
Default

I would go with at least a XP3. I currently have an xb3 on a 75 and it does an decent job and had two on a 135. I wouldnt use the recomendations for size tanks given by the company.
Gump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007, 05:21 PM   #4
flamingo
One Word: Croutons.
 
flamingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Age: 17
Posts: 1,897
Send a message via MSN to flamingo
Default

I had an xp1 filtering my 65 once..

I think cascade's are just rip-offs so I would choose an xp model.
__________________
If you put "u" instead of typing out the actual, shocking, three letter word... i'm not going to read your ramblings.
I'm so behind it's not even funny.
flamingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007, 07:28 PM   #5
fishfingers
Senior Member
 
fishfingers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Age: 18
Posts: 129
Default

If you are wanting to go saltwater, I would save your money for better filtration that a canister filter. Canister filters don't really have much use in most marine aquariums.
fishfingers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 02:58 PM   #6
flamingo
One Word: Croutons.
 
flamingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Age: 17
Posts: 1,897
Send a message via MSN to flamingo
Default

Fishfingers, i'd have to disagree, if you clean them regularily, and do enough water changes, they're excellent. I have one running my 30 gallon seahorse tank and I like it a lot more than a simple HOB filter, etc.
__________________
If you put "u" instead of typing out the actual, shocking, three letter word... i'm not going to read your ramblings.
I'm so behind it's not even funny.
flamingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 04:46 PM   #7
fishfingers
Senior Member
 
fishfingers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Age: 18
Posts: 129
Default

$109 of live rock would still be much better IMO. I wouldn't use a canister on anything but a fish only tank. I've found that unless you clean mechanical filtration everyday then all the detritus is gonna break down into nitrates. It's the same with bioballs, etc all it does is trap detritus and lead to nitrates. That's alright on a fish only, but if your trying to make a reef tank and keep you nitrates as low as possible it us to much hassle for any benefits you might get. Especially as you can filter your tank a lot better without as much hassle using other methods. It might work, but from my experience other methods of filtration are much easier and more effective.
fishfingers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 04:58 PM   #8
flamingo
One Word: Croutons.
 
flamingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Age: 17
Posts: 1,897
Send a message via MSN to flamingo
Default

Ic ic. Just in my personal preference I like canisters. I clean it once a month, do weekly water changes and I have 0 ammonia, nitrates, and nitrates- I even feed frozen 3-4 times a day.

If I had all the money for a sump on something like a large reef tank, i'd certainly go the way of sumps, etc. But, in my case, canisters work just fine.
__________________
If you put "u" instead of typing out the actual, shocking, three letter word... i'm not going to read your ramblings.
I'm so behind it's not even funny.
flamingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 07:21 PM   #9
Moltenice
Bike/Car guy...
 
Moltenice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Age: 26
Posts: 37
Default

yeah I thin kI am pretty much counting out saltwater. I think I will have my hands full with the 60fal freshwater and I will save teh salt water until I have a few years of experience under my belt.

The XP3 is going to be the choice for the 60gal.
__________________
10gal community tank.... 4 Neon tetras, 1 rainbow molly adult and her baby (rice grain size currently)

55gal Malawi tank..... Caribbean white sand, artificial Rock structure with lots of tunnels, and some hearty plants. Powered by a Filstar XP4.
Moltenice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 07:25 PM   #10
JustOneMore20
Moderator
 
JustOneMore20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Alabama, US
Age: 22
Posts: 3,487
Default

Your cichlids still need a tank bigger than 10 gallons, so I'd save up for atleast a 40g for them.
__________________
*Kristin*
5 Planted tanks:
55g, 40g, 29g, 10g, 5.5g

10g N. multifasciatus tank, 5.5g Platy fry


JustOneMore20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More reading and decided ... Ice Beginner Saltwater 9 11-09-2006 12:43 PM
I hAVE DECIDED SORTA ACCIDENT General Freshwater 15 02-14-2006 06:20 AM
I've decided what I want! yes sir! AshleytheGreat Cichlids 8 07-29-2005 04:43 PM
So the silicone on my 55gal decided to let go today... Vassili General Freshwater 13 03-22-2005 08:09 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright - FishForums.com