![]() |
|
|||||||
Members currently in the Chat:0
|
|||||
![]() |
Users In Chat Room: There are several users in chat now! Don't Be Shy - click here and come on in! |
||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1
|
hey all
I am going to Ottawa on Thursday. and i was wondering whichj of the two is the better to buy, i have one store saying the fluval is crap and the other saying its great.. but the other doesnt sell the EHEIMs... which is the better product? easy set up? easy clean? not too much money a year and last a LONG time any information is welcome oh its for a 130 gal turtle tank Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Fish Guru
|
I believe eheims gets the better review, but never owned one myself... fluvals in my experiance do well, media changes every one or two months so not much spending there. So I'd get whatever is cheaper.
__________________
210 Gal Reef w/ 55 Gallon Sump/Fuge, 125 Gal Fish Only, 65 Gal Seahorse-29 Gallon Sump, 55 Gal FOWLR, 54 Gal Corner FW Community, 20 Gal Nano FOWLR, 55 Gal Piranha, 29 gallon QT "All the yellow tangs and clownfish in the world can't save you now! hahahah" Peter from Family Guy |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Fishy Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 27
|
In my experience having owned various models of both - eheims are generally of a better build and design but thats not to say that fluval cannisters are bad because they arent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Aquatic Naturalist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Age: 32
Posts: 14,971
|
I'd have to concur. They are both top of the line filters. Enheims are a little quieter and come with spraybars while fluvals dont. Enheims are usually easier to prime but the difference is not really noticeable. Enheims also make great powered reactors for adding CO2 into your tank. Enheims also cost a LOT more on the average for comparable models. You cant go wrong with either.
__________________
For in much wisdom [is] much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. ![]() Member of the AGA (Aquatic Gardner's Association) Member of the IBC (International Betta Congress) |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Age: 90
Posts: 496
|
IMO- Eheim is a Rolls Royce and Fluval is a Hugo. I have two Eheim Pro II 2026 with one serving as the "reactor" for pressurized co2. I got a Fluval 404 as part of a used tank and equipment package and I sold the Fluval for $25 and put the proceeds towards the purchase of my 2nd Eheim Pro II.
You might want to look at Filstar canister as a cheaper alternative as opposed to Fluval. There are plenty of folks who swear by Fluvals, but there are many who swear at them as well. You will rarely hear anything bad about Eheims except that they are pricey. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 633
|
I'm sick and tired of my Fluvals, in my opinion Eheim is way better and don't make that much noise.
__________________
http://photobucket.com/albums/v640/osteoporoosi/ |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fluval vs Aquaone filters | polerz | Equipment & Technologies | 4 | 01-27-2006 10:08 AM |
| Eheim 2126 Canister | Aspec | Atlanta Area Aquarium Association | 3 | 01-25-2006 08:40 PM |
| Media Filter for Fluval 404? | Mr Fish | General Freshwater | 3 | 10-30-2005 05:34 AM |
| Fluval 404 Rattling | Ben'sFish | General Freshwater | 2 | 04-28-2005 03:03 PM |
| Fluval 404 canister filter questions.... | fishfrenzy | General Freshwater | 3 | 03-05-2005 12:32 PM |